The Toyota Grand Highlander’s rear backup camera has a standard washer for maintaining a clear view under various conditions. In contrast, the Mazda CX-90 does not offer a rear camera washer, meaning its effectiveness relies on manual cleaning by the user when necessary.
Both the Grand Highlander and the CX-90 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Grand Highlander is safer than the Mazda CX-90:
|
Grand Highlander |
CX-90 |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Neck Compression |
12 lbs. |
133 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
331/316 lbs. |
324/335 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
33% |
42.3% |
Neck Compression |
60 lbs. |
83 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Grand Highlander is safer than the Mazda CX-90:
|
Grand Highlander |
CX-90 |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
344 |
410 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.